Sorry, there was no activity found. Please try a different filter.
Group Admins
Recent Massachusetts Sports Betting Bill Features Massive Tax Hike & Restriction on Live Betting
active 1 year, 3 months ago
Public Group
Massachusetts sports betting might look completely different if a new bill proposed in the Senate achieves success. And if history is any indication, managed sports betting in other states might likewise change considerably.
SD 1657 existed by Sen. John Keenan. “An Act Addressing Economic, Health, and Social Harms Caused by Sports Betting” aims to increase the present sports betting tax rate from 20% to 51%. In Addition, Sen. Keenan requires a total restriction on live sports betting (in-game wagering) and prop bets.
The main point to keep in mind is that Massachusetts has actually been at the leading edge of stricter sports betting policies. The 2nd thing to understand is that the language of this expense resembles the SAFE Bet Act, a federal piece of legislation introduced in 2024.
This costs was introduced not long after previous Massachusetts Governor and current NCAA president Charlie Baker affirmed in front of the Senate in a meeting on sports betting guideline.
So, while this is presently a Massachusetts bill, it’s most likely to impact other states that provide controlled sports betting.
A closer look at SD 1657
Tax
Starting with the tax rate increase, bringing sports betting to 51% has actually been a target for Sen. Keenan before. Keenan proposed a tax increase at the last legal session, however it was rejected. This increase would have can be found in the state’s budget plan bill.
Just 3 markets have tax rates of 51%, the highest in the country: New York, Rhode Island, and New Hampshire. At 20%, Massachusetts currently ranks sixth greatest.
Prohibiting live betting and prop betting
The procedure prohibits in-play (live sports betting) or prop sports betting. Only straight wagers would be permitted, limiting sportsbooks to providing only moneyline, spread, and totals.
While Massachusetts and other markets have restrictions on collegiate sports betting, this would affect even professional sporting events.
The bill also seeks to include bonuses and same-game parlays to the category of “unfair and deceptive practices.” Sportsbooks favour same-game parlays due to their high “hold” percentage, the quantity of money they deflect each $1 bet.
Player Limits
SD 1657 likewise aims to produce mandatory everyday and month-to-month limits for bettors. Bettors might not wager more than $1,000 a day and $10,000 a month without an ‘price assessment’ which includes inspecting bank accounts. A player can not wager more than 15% of the amount in their account.
Massachusetts would become the very first market to need a cost evaluation on bettors.
Marketing limitations
Keenan likewise wishes to eliminate marketing throughout telecasted sporting events. The procedure would prohibit sportsbooks from running ads during video games. The Massachusetts Gaming Commission has actually checked out producing a restriction on in-game advertisements before. Nevertheless, this did not go through as nationwide TV deals make this difficult to enforce.
Will the procedure pass?
The measure is extreme in its modifications to the sports betting industry in Massachusetts. Banning prop sports betting and increasing the sports betting tax rate will likely lead to pushback from local sportsbooks and market fans.
Because of this, the procedure will likely be combated in the Senate and the House of Representatives. In the previous session, Keenan failed to raise the tax rate.
He would have to convince the other senators who did not support his initiative before to change their minds. If and when the Senate discusses this step, it is difficult to tell how it will be gotten.